International News: Supreme Court Appears to Favor Former Mail Carrier in Religious Accommodation Case
WASHINGTON — During oral arguments on Tuesday, the Supreme Court appeared to side with Gerald Groff, a former mail carrier and evangelical Christian, who is seeking accommodation from the US Postal Service (USPS) for his request not to work on Sundays. The lower court had previously ruled against Groff, stating that his request would cause an "undue burden" on the USPS and lead to low morale among employees.
Justice Elena Kagan commented on a perceived level of agreement among the justices during the nearly two-hour hearing, referring to it as "kumbaya-ing." However, differences emerged as the court sought to establish a test for lower courts to clarify the extent to which employers must accommodate their employees' religious beliefs.
A lawyer for Groff suggested overturning decades-old precedent, a proposal that was met with openness from Conservative Justice Samuel Alito. Conversely, Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Brett Kavanaugh expressed sympathy towards the Postal Service's concerns regarding the potential impact on employee morale if Groff's request were granted.
Kavanaugh emphasized the significance of "morale" in the success of any business, while several justices acknowledged the financial challenges faced by the USPS over the years.
Groff, a resident of Pennsylvania, served as a rural carrier associate at the USPS from 2012 to 2013. In this role, he provided coverage for absent career employees who had earned weekend off privileges. Upon the USPS contracting with Amazon to deliver packages on Sundays, Groff's Christian religious beliefs prevented him from working on that day.
United States Postal Service (USPS) employee Samuel Groff has filed a lawsuit against the agency, alleging religious discrimination after being denied accommodation for his Sabbath observance on Sundays. Groff, who previously worked as a mail carrier, claimed that he faced progressive discipline and a tense work environment due to his refusal to work on Sundays.
The USPS initially contemplated accommodations for Groff, such as adjusting his schedule to allow for attendance at religious services or finding other employees to cover his shifts. However, the postmaster himself reportedly took over deliveries due to the difficulty in finding willing Sunday workers. The USPS subsequently suggested that Groff find an alternative day to observe the Sabbath.
In his resignation letter, dated 2019, Groff stated that he was unable to find a "accommodating employment atmosphere" within the USPS that respected his religious beliefs. He is now suing the agency under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination based on religion.
To make a claim under Title VII, an employee must demonstrate that they hold sincere religious beliefs that conflict with job requirements, have informed their employer, and have been disciplined for failing to comply. The burden then shifts to the employer, who must show that they made reasonable efforts to accommodate the employee's belief or prove that such accommodation would cause "undue hardship."
In this case, District Judge Jeffrey Schmehl, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, ruled against Groff, finding that his request for a Sunday exemption would result in "undue hardship" for the USPS. The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed this ruling in a decision yet to be publicly released.
The outcome of this case may set a precedent for future accommodations of religious beliefs within federal workplaces.
Title: USPS v. Groff: Supreme Court Addresses Employer's Obligation Towards Employee's Sabbath Observance
Lead: The United States Postal Service (USPS) has been granted permission by the Supreme Court to impose Sunday work on a mail carrier, Gerald Groff, who wishes to observe his Sabbath. In its ruling last year, the 3rd Circuit determined that exempting Groff from working Sundays would cause an undue hardship on USPS, citing disruptions to workplace and workflow, and decreased employee morale. A dissenting judge, Thomas Hardiman, argued that the law requires USPS to demonstrate how the proposed accommodation would harm its business operations, not Groff's colleagues.
The court case revolves around Groff's sincerely held religious belief that prohibits him from working on Sundays. His lawyer, Aaron Streett, contends that the USPS could have made accommodations without causing significant inconvenience, and that it was incorrect to claim that respecting Groff's belief would be overly burdensome. Streett urged the justices to reconsider precedent to allow for an accommodation enabling Groff to balance his employment duties with his religious beliefs.
In a recent interview with The New York Times, Groff expressed disappointment at being asked to forego his Sabbath rituals and Sunday gatherings as a believer. He described the day as a time to come together with fellow worshippers, celebrate their faith, and worship God. Groff lamented that he would have to forsake these experiences to deliver Amazon parcels on Sundays.
The Biden administration has urged the high court to clarify the law to establish that an employer is not obligated to accommodate an employee's Sabbath observance by operating with reduced staff or regularly. The impending ruling promises to set a significant precedent for the balance between religious freedom and employment duties in the United States.
Title: Solicitor General Confirms Employers May Offer Overtime for Temporary Workers but Could Face Additional Costs
In a recent development, the Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar has confirmed that employers may offer overtime pay to secure replacement workers. However, it's important to note that such employers could still be mandated to bear other costs associated with administrative expenses related to rearranging schedules. This report has been updated with additional details.
Source: Read Original Article